Wahlgren v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The assignments of error may be considered under three headings, (a) Does the contract between Roy Wahlgren and Bausch & Lomb Company as modified prevent the former from engaging in the employment or business of manufacturing and selling optical instruments for a period of five years? (b) Does the evidence show that the other appellants knowingly joined with Roy Wahl-gren in building up a business in violation of said contract of Wahlgren and appellee, Banseh & Lomb Company, or in conspiring with Roy Wahlgren to injure appellees’ business? (e) Does the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mammoth Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wark v. Ervin Press CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Broxham v. Borden's Farm Products Co. of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
3Cited by30 opinions
- Banco Popular North America v. GandiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- LoBiondo v. SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Thornwood, Inc. v. Jenner & BlockAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Morganroth & Morganroth v. Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Guilford Glazer v. Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer, Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer v. Guilford GlazerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.