Legal Opinion

Holt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 16, 1930No. Nos. 4425, 4426PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgments affirmed.

On Petition for Rehearing.

Only one question—the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict—is presented by this appeal. After a careful study of the record, we became convinced that the trial court was right in denying appellants’ motion for a directed verdict and in submitting the case to the jury. Any opinion, which we might write, would necessarily be devoted to a discussion of the evidence, its weight and effect. We therefore found no justification for filing a written opinion.

Counsel for appellants have renewed their arguments in a brief in support of a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wahlgren v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  2. Booth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API