Holt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Judgments affirmed.
On Petition for Rehearing.
Only one question—the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict—is presented by this appeal. After a careful study of the record, we became convinced that the trial court was right in denying appellants’ motion for a directed verdict and in submitting the case to the jury. Any opinion, which we might write, would necessarily be devoted to a discussion of the evidence, its weight and effect. We therefore found no justification for filing a written opinion.
Counsel for appellants have renewed their arguments in a brief in support of a…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Wahlgren v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- Booth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932