Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leuthold v. Des Moines Joint Stock Land Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1936No. 30,762PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

I dissent. The exemption provision in the Minnesota mortgage moratorium act reads that the provisions of the act "shall not apply to any mortgage while such mortgage is held by the United States or by any agency * * * thereof." The South Dakota mortgage moratorium act, of which the majority opinion makes mention, exempts from the operation of its provisions mortgages held by "the United States Government, or any agent, agency, orinstrumentality of the United States." (Italics mine.) In view of the fact that the provision is more inclusive and broader than the exemption provision in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Federal Land Bank v. PriddySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. CroslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leuthold v. Des Moines Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API