Legal Opinion

Myrtle Manor Apartments v. City of Phoenix

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 18, 1994No. 1 CA-TX 91-0040PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

Taxpayers Myrtle Manor Apartments and Momingside Villa Apartments appeal from a judgment in favor of the City of Phoenix on refund claims for Phoenix privilege taxes assessed on sums the taxpayers received under housing assistance payment (HAP) contracts funded by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The City cross-appeals from the tax court’s holding that the value of the taxpayers’ on-site managers’ use of apartment units was not includable in the taxpayers’ gross income. We consider:(1) Whether the tax court erred in holding that HUD…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. U-Stor Bell, L.L.C. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API