Legal Opinion

U-Stor Bell, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 26, 2002No. 1 CA-TX 01-0013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SNOW, Judge.

¶ 1 The appellee taxpayers are owners of self-storage facilities. Each of their facilities incorporates an apartment in which the facility manager must live as a condition of employment (“manager apartments”). For ad valorem property tax purposes for the tax years 1998 through 2001, Maricopa and Pima *80Counties (“the counties”) classified the taxpayers’ self-storage facilities, including those portions used as manager apartments, as class one commercial property.1

¶2 When the taxpayers challenged this classification, the tax court granted summary judgment in their favor. It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Arizona Highway DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hayden Partners Ltd. Partnership v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Arturo R. Moreno, Personal Representative of Oswaldo Moreno, Deceased v. Stahmann Farms, Inc., a New Mexico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  4. Krausz v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Myrtle Manor Apartments v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API