Legal Opinion

O’connor v. Ohio

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 14, 1966No. 477PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Per curiam

This is the second time petitioner has come before this Court with the claim that the prosecutor’s comment upon his failure to testify during his trial for larceny violated the constitutional right to remain silent. In O’Connor v. Ohio, 382 U. S. 286, we considered this contention when we granted certiorari, vacated the conviction and remanded the case to the Supreme Court of Ohio for further proceedings in light of our decision in Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609. Following remand, the Ohio court by a closely divided vote upheld petitioner’s conviction solely on the ground that he failed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. O'Connor v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. People v. Castellano, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API