Legal Opinion

United States v. Coppersmith

United States Circuit Court

Decided July 1, 1880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Indictmént for counterfeiting.

1Opinion of the Court

Hammond, D. J.

The defendant, being on trial for counterfeiting the coin of the United States, has peremptorily challenged three of the jurors tendered to him, and claims the .right to challenge another, and any number to the extent of 10, under section 819 of the Eevised Statutes. He insists that the offence of mating counterfeit coin is a felony at common law, and therefore a felony in the purview of that section; he also insists that being punishable by imprisonment at hard labor, which necessarily implies confinement in a •penitentiary, it is a felony according to the ordinary acceptation…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. United States v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  3. Fox v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  4. United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1820

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jerome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Dolan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. United States v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  4. United States v. DavisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1900
  5. United States v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API