Legal Opinion
Crawford v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 2009No. B210821PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
This appeal concerns application of the one-year statute of limitations contained in the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.). James Crawford was a detective in the Los Angeles Police Department (Department). Having been accused of nine counts of misconduct, Crawford’s employment was terminated after an administrative hearing and an adverse decision by the Department’s Board of Rights, which found him guilty of six counts of misconduct. Crawford brought a petition for peremptory writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Mays v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Alameida v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jackson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Parra v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garcia v. State Dept. of Developmental ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Gonzalez v. LA County Civil Service Com. CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2014