State v. Mooers
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOOMEY, Judge:
¶1 Ryan Mocers appeals from an order to pay restitution. The primary issue on appeal is whether a restitution order imposed as a condition of a plea in abeyance agreement, where the defendant's plea has not been entered and the defendant has not been sentenced, is a final and appealable order, We conclude that it is not. We therefore dismiss Mooers's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
T2 In November 2012, a family returned from vacation and discovered that someone had broken into their house through a.basement window and had taken jewelry and coins. For his role in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GerrardUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. SnyderUtah Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Mooers and BeckerUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- State v. MooersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018