Legal Opinion

State v. Mooers

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 5, 2015No. 20140170-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOOMEY, Judge:

¶1 Ryan Mocers appeals from an order to pay restitution. The primary issue on appeal is whether a restitution order imposed as a condition of a plea in abeyance agreement, where the defendant's plea has not been entered and the defendant has not been sentenced, is a final and appealable order, We conclude that it is not. We therefore dismiss Mooers's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

BACKGROUND

T2 In November 2012, a family returned from vacation and discovered that someone had broken into their house through a.basement window and had taken jewelry and coins. For his role in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. GerrardUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. SnyderUtah Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Mooers and BeckerUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  4. State v. MooersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API