Legal Opinion

Beyer v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1943No. 28861PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The principal question presented by this appeal is, what is the proper award for the enucleation of an eye which had become totally blind prior to the enucleation, and the injury which required it.

In 1935, the respondent, Beyer, while working for a pulp company, received a traumatic injury, resulting in the complete loss of sight of his right eye. For some reason, no claim was made under the workmen’s com pensation act, and he has never received compensation for that injury. In July, 1941, he received an injury to the same eye, while employed in a woodworking plant, and, the eye not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rehberger v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Klippert v. Industrial Insurance DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Biglan v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Iacone v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Blair v. Armour and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Corak v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Tomlinson v. Puget Sound Freight LinesWashington Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API