Legal Opinion

Rehberger v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1929No. 22087. Department OnePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an appeal from a final judgment, adverse to the department, based upon the verdict of a jury.

By its assignment of errors, the appellant seems to raise but two questions, i. e., the sufficiency of the evidence and the amount of the attorney’s fees properly allowable, but in tbe briefs and argument certain instructions to tbe jury are criticized, and we shall therefore consider them.

It appears that respondent, while so employed as to come under the workmen’s compensation act, in September, 1927, suffered an injury which resulted in the amputation of his right leg below the knee at about…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knipple v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Kendall v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Barkhurst v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brand v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Brand v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Harbor Plywood Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bennett v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Harrington v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API