Legal Opinion
United States v. Cordo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 26, 1951No. 70, Docket 21780PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
Bernard Boruck, Harry Minkoff, Vito Jordan Cordo, Pasquale William di Pinto, Arthur Lief, Max Boruck and James Boruck were charged in count one of an indictment with possessing goods stolen from interstate commerce knowing them to have been stolen, and in count two with having conspired with each other and with other persons unknown to receive and possess such goods contrary to the provisions of 18 U.S. C.A. § 409. 1 Cordo, di Pinto and Lief having first changed their pleas from not guilty to guilty, testified in behalf of the government at the trial of the others. Max…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- United States v. ZeuliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Thomas E. Flaherty, United States of America v. James R. Kearns, Jr., United States of America v. Stuart H. WahlCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Frederick Dale AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Rudolph J. Nassif v. United States of America, Paul Otto Schmadebeck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Phillip L. Rogers, United States of America v. Charles SpottsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- United States v. On LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.