State v. Fridleifson
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
¶ 1 Defendant challenges his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, a third degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 58 — 37—8(2)(a)(i) (Supp.2002). Specifically, Defendant claims that the police lacked reasonable articulable suspicion to detain him. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Because determining the reasonableness of police conduct is fact sensitive, we describe the facts leading to the seizure of evidence in this case in detail. See State v. Potter, 863 P.2d 40, 40 (Utah Ct.App.1993).
¶ 3 For over a year Officers Larson and Washington and other Salt…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Salt Lake City v. RayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- State v. PreeceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- State v. GironCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clayton v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- State v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Bearden v. Wardley Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- State v. MarklandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- State v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003