Legal Opinion
Companies for Fair Allocation v. Axil Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 11, 1994No. Civ. 2:92CV00674(AHN)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
NEVAS, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, the Companies for Fair Allocation (“plaintiffs”), bring this action against the defendants, the Axil Corporation; J.P.S. Manufacturing, Inc.; Dynamics Corporation; BNB Manufacturing, Inc.; Sanitary Services Corporation; Kaman Music Corporation; Automated Material Handling, Inc.; Tom Corvo, Ltd.; John Fiori; The Dino Corporation, Isabell Bull; and M.S.I., Inc., 1 pursuant to sections 107(a) and 113(f) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Town of Wallkill v. Tesa Tape Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Town of New Windsor v. Tesa Tuck, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Ekotek Site PRP Committee v. SelfDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
- Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
- OHM Remediation Services v. Evans Cooperage Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.