Legal Opinion

Versch v. Tichota

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1974No. 39405PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This is an action for the allowance for attorney’s fees in a subrogation case. After settlement of the original claim for damages, and subsequent allocation of the proceeds between the plaintiff-employee Versch, and the defendant-employer City of Omaha (hereinafter referred to as the “City”), as subrogee, the plaintiff’s attorney made application for attorney’s fees in the amount of one-third of the fund recovered by the City, $2,250. The trial court approved the application but modified the amount of fees due to one-fifth, $1,350. From this ruling, the City appeals and the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brasier v. CribbettNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gillotte v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Skag-Way Department Stores, Inc. v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Douglas & Lomason Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wollenburg v. ConradNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Schulz v. General Wholesale Co-Op. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Combined Insurance v. ShurterNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Guardianship & Conservatorship of BorowiakNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API