Legal Opinion
Wollenburg v. Conrad
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1994No. S-93-076PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
Carl E. Wollenburg appeals the suspension of his driver’s license for failure to show proof of financial responsibility after he drove his pickup truck into the side of a Burlington Northern (BN) railroad car at a rural road crossing in Gage County.
Wollenburg’s license was suspended by the Nebraska Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Upon appeal by Wollenburg, that ruling was affirmed by the district court for Gage County. We affirm the decision of the district court.
FACTS
On the evening of September 30, 1991, Wollenburg was operating his pickup with only one lighted headlight. At…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jennings v. MahoneySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Crewdson v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Mantz v. Continental Western InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Jacobson v. HigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marshall v. WimesNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Kempke v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Clayton v. NEB. DEPT. OF MOTOR VEHICLESNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Huddleson v. AbramsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Jennifer M. GurtnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.