Legal Opinion

C. B. Ensign & Co. v. Forrest

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 24, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

This is ah action by the indorsee against the maker of two promissory notes payable to the order of Partin Manufacturing Company, Incorporated. There was evidence that the plaintiff received the notes before their maturity without notice of any infirmity, paid value for them, and was a holder in due course. The defendant testified that the notes were in his possession when an agent of the Partin Manufacturing Company called on him and asked to see them; that the notes were signed by the defendant; that during his absence the agent took the notes; that after the agent had departed the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shipley v. CarrollIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Massachusetts National Bank v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Manker v. American Savings Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Clarke v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Angus v. DownsWashington Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of New Port Richey v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  2. Cohn v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API