Legal Opinion · Dissent

Froneberger v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 28, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-191306; No. 5168Published

1DissentFew, C.J.

Kirkland and Janel Smith fraudulently and tortiously misappropriated the Fronebergers’ retirement funds. There is no evidence in this record, however, that in doing so either of them acted as an agent of Euro Mortgage Bankers, Inc. Therefore, I would affirm the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment to Euro.

A. Apparent Authority

The majority correctly concludes there is no evidence of agency through apparent authority. In reaching this correct conclusion, however, the majority has confused the elements of apparent authority and has misstated the first element.

“The basis of apparent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. James v. Kelly Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Bayle v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Dawkins v. FieldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Degenhart v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Fernander v. ThigpenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API