Legal Opinion
Ramos v. M & F Fashions, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 11, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
VILLANUEVA, J.A.D.
(retired and temporarily assigned on recall).
The Second Injury Fund (“SIF”) appeals from the final decision of the Workers’ Compensation Division which concluded that the accident was compensable and petitioner, Felipe Ramos, was totally and permanently disabled, with 66-2/3% fault apportioned to M & F Fashions, Inc. (“M & F”), and the balance of 33-1/3% apportioned to appellant SIF. We reverse.
Petitioner was hired as a presser by M & F in approximately 1986. He worked forty hours per week, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at a rate of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Hammond v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Cressey v. Campus Chefs, Div. of CVI Serv., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ramos v. M & F FASHIONS, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Ramos v. M & F FASHIONS, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Ramos v. M & F FASHIONS, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998