Legal Opinion
Mills v. Reynolds
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1992No. 89-193, 89-195PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Chief Justice.
In the rehearing granted in this case, Appellants Timothy L. Mills and Levi Harry Bunker ask this Court to declare that Wyo.Stat. § 27-14-104(a) (1987) was unconstitutional. We hold that the statute, which, under the Wyoming worker’s compensation scheme, granted immunity from suits by co-employees to employees who were acting within the scope of their employment, was unconstitutional because it violated the Wyoming Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection.1
*50Mills and Bunker presented the following issues in their original briefs:
1. Does Wyo.Stats.1977, as amended,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Washakie County School District Number One v. HerschlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Dworkin v. L.F.P., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Hawk Ex Rel. Jensen v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Robinson v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Greenwalt v. Ram Restaurant Corp. of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Picher v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.