Legal Opinion

Amy S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2019No. Supreme Court No. S-17008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A mother appeals the superior court's decision adjudicating her child as a child in need of aid, contending that the court relied in part on the record from her previous custody proceeding without giving her prior notice. The mother argues that by not giving her notice, the court violated her due process rights. Relying on cases involving judicial bias, she then claims that the superior court's due process violation warrants automatic reversal of the court's adjudication finding, or, alternatively, reversal on the basis that the error was not harmless.

We…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Rabi R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Taryn M. v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Tuluksak Native Community v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. C.D., a Minor v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Troy A. Rohde v. Annette L. RohdeAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API