Legal Opinion
Battle & Co. v. Finlay
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana
Decided April 2, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions
In Equity. Motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.
On this preliminary hearing the ease shows that the complainants and their assignors, from about 1877, adopted for their use as a trade-mark, (for a chemical or medicinal preparation manufactured by them under an allege’d private formula, composed of chloral hydrate, bromide of potassium, extract of cannabis indica, and extract of hyoscyamus,) the word “Bromidia,” a word coined for and arbitrarily applied to the preparation aforesaid; that thereafter they manufactured this said preparation, put it in the market with the said label, “Bromidia,” and built up and established a business in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Roberts v. SheldonU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1879
3Cited by10 opinions
- N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Luckel, King & Cake Soap Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
- W. G. Reardon Laboratories, Inc. v. B. & B. Exterminators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Baker v. Master Printers Union of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Central Lard Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
- Clorox Chemical Co. v. Chlorit Mfg. CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.