Legal Opinion
Clorox Chemical Co. v. Chlorit Mfg. Corporation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 25, 1938No. 8579PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is an application made by Clorox Chemical Company, plaintiff, for a preliminary injunction against Chlorit Manufacturing Corporation, Meyer Feldman, and Harry L. Senderoff, the defendants herein. The defendants Feldman and Senderoff are officers and agents of the Chlorit Manufacturing Corporation.
The following relief is demanded:
“That the defendants, their officers, servants, agents, employees and attorneys, and those acting in privity or in concert with them, or any of them, be pendente lite and permanently enjoined and restrained:
“(a) From using the name…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northam Warren Corporation v. Universal Cosmetic Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
- N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Central Lard Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
- Allen v. Walker & GibsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1916
- Battle & Co. v. FinlayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1891
- Nu Enamel Corp. v. Nate Enamel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Blinded Veterans Ass'n v. Blinded American Veterans FoundationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Janet Travis, Inc. v. Preka Holdings, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Blinded Veterans Association v. Blinded American Veterans FoundationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.