Legal Opinion

In re the Application by Novak

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1989No. 16576PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

CASE SUMMARY

We hold that SDCL 22-14-15,1 set forth in extenso below, establishes a substantive offense (felon previously convicted of a crime of violence who has a firearm in his possession or in his control is guilty of a Class 6 felony) and that sentencing upon conviction under that statute may be enhanced through SDCL 22-7-7.2

*531PROCEDURAL HISTORY/LEGAL CONTENTIONS

This is a habeas corpus appeal. Petitioner/Appellant Robert Novak (Novak) was convicted, by a Minnehaha County jury, of one count of possession of a firearm by one convicted of a prior violent crime (SDCL…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. LaytonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. McNeillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Carroll v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. RogersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API