Legal Opinion

State v. McNeill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 8516SC438PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the denial of his motion to dismiss the charge, contending that the evidence was insufficient to show a violation of G.S. 14-415.1(a) because his possession of the handgun fell within an exception to the statute. We disagree and find no error in the trial.

G.S. 14-415(a) provides as follows:

It shall be unlawful for any person who has been convicted of any crime set out in subsection (b) of this section to purchase, own, possess, or have in his custody, care or control any handgun or other firearm with a barrel length of less than 18 inches or an overall…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Hines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. State v. . ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. NapierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. CloningerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. OrtizSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API