Legal Opinion

United States v. Anchor Coal Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 1929No. 355; No. 356; No. 357; No. 358PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

These appeals have been fully argued and considered, but in the present situation we find that they present moot issues and that further proceedings upon the merits can neither be had here nor in the court of first instance. To dismiss the appeals would leave the injunction in force, at least apparently so, notwithstanding that the basis therefor has disappeared. Our action must, therefore, dispose of the cause, not merely of the appellate proceedings which brought it here. The practice now established by this Court under similar conditions and circumstances is to reverse the deciee below and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien GesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Brownlow v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Heitmuller v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Commercial Cable Co. v. BurlesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Alejandrino v. QuezonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Cover v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Alexander Sprunt & Son, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API