Legal Opinion

Nohl v. County of Del Norte

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1919No. Civ. No. 3074PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from' a default judgment and from an order of the Superior Court of Del Norte County denying a motion to set aside the default and permit the defendant to answer. John L. Childs, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a default judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffs after the overruling of the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, and from the denial of defendant’s motion to set aside the default and to permit it to file and serve its answer.

The complaint contains' three separate and distinct causes of action growing out of an alleged violation of a certain contract for road work entered into between plaintiffs and defendant. The first cause of action consists of a demand for the sum of $103.87 for hauling and dumping rock; the second for damages in the sum of two thousand…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eachus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Cox v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Belt v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Weisshand v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Parker v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Cooper v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Dillard v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Atlantic Aviation Corp. v. Port of NY AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Schultz v. Los Angeles Dons, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API