Legal Opinion

Simchuck v. Fullerton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1974No. 44039PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edward D. Mulally, Justice. *

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying the motion of William J. Simchuck for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial, or for an additur.

The action arises out of a two-car accident which occurred on June 2, 1969, at the intersection of Willmar Avenue and Highway No. 71 in the city of Willmar, Minnesota. The intersection is controlled by automatic semaphores, and Highway No. 71 is a four-lane road at the intersection.

Christine Fullerton, age 16 at the time of the accident, was driving her father’s car in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Riley v. LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Richfield Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. In Re Estate of BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Spannaus v. ArrowoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Minnesota Personal Injury Asbestos Cases v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Buck v. DibbleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API