Legal Opinion

Haselton v. Interstate Stage Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 4, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The defendant sets up the unconstitutionality of the amended statute under the commerce clause of the federal constitution, art. 1, s. 8, and also denies its applicability to the situation here. Bach of these issues involves the construction of the statute.

1. It may be conceded that the terms of the act are sufficiently broad to include an order to forbid the defendant’s interstate operations except upon compliance with its requirements, and that, if so construed and applied, the defendant would be within the protection of the commerce clause of the federal constitution. It does not, however,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Piper v. MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Cain v. BowlbyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  3. Public Service Commission v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In re Sioux Falls Traction SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. HoskinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API