Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Sioux Falls Traction System

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1929No. File No. 6298PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Sioux Falls Traction System applied to the board of railroad commissioners for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate as a class A motor carrier for the transportation of passengers and baggage between Sioux Falls, S'. D., and Sioux City, Iowa, via Harrisburg, Canton, and Hudson, S. D., Hawarden, 'Chatsworth, Akron, and Westfield, Iowa, and Richland, Elk Point, and Jefferson, S. D. After a hearing, the Railroad Commission granted! a certificate for interstate transportation only, and denied the application so far as it affected intrastate transportation in South Dakota.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Clark v. PoorSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Smallwood v. JeterIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Interstate Busses Corp. v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Application of Dakota Transp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  2. McKinnon v. State Banking CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Vander Werf v. Bd. of Railroad CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Board of Railroad CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. C., M., St. P. P.R. Co. v. R.R. Commrs.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API