Legal Opinion

Terminal Investment Co. v. Pope Estate Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1932No. Docket No. 7973PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal was taken from a judgment entered upon the sustaining of a demurrer to an amended and supplemental complaint, without leave to amend. The action was brought to recover $7,317.04 paid under protest by appellant to respondent as reimbursement for income taxes paid on rental it had received from appellant for the years 1920 to 1923, inclusive. Incidentally, it was for a decree declaratory of the rights and duties of the parties under the tax covenant of the lease, but this feature has been dropped from the ease.

In 1909 the respondent, owner of a parcel of real property on…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Brainard v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Young v. Illinois AthLetic ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Stony Brook Railroad v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Monongahela Street Railway Co. v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co. v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Berylwood Investment Co. v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Harlow v. Buno Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939
  5. Mettler v. BralyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API