Legal Opinion
Purdy v. City of York
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1993No. S-91-059PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanphier, J.
The defendant, the City of York, Nebraska (City), appeals from a judgment of the district court for York County vacating and setting aside a special assessment levied against the property of the plaintiffs, Shirley A. Purdy and Anita Pearson, for the construction of water extension district No. 88-2. The district court found that the ordinance creating water extension district No. 88-2 was null and void because the City failed to comply with the notice provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 16-667.01 (Reissue 1991). We reverse, and remand with directions.
BACKGROUND
The City created water extension…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Lincoln County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Nebco, Inc. v. SpeedlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- North Platte, Nebraska Hospital Corp v. City of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Brown v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- First Assembly of God Church v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Nebco, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Bennett v. Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Lancaster County v. SlezakNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
- Johnson v. City of KearneyNebraska Court of Appeals · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.