Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Moore v. Brewster
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 2003No. ED 81190PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., Presiding Judge.
Appellants/cross-respondents, Harold Brewster (“Brewster”) and the Board of Education of the City of St. Louis (“the Board”) appeal from the judgment, after a bench trial, of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis pursuant to a petition in mandamus seeking enforcement of the Sunshine Law, chapter 610, et seq., RSMO 2000, 1 which was later amended and supplemented by a petition invoking section 162.681, 2 both of which were filed by respondents/cross-appellants, Rochell Moore (“Moore”) and Amy L. Hilgemann (“Hilge-mann”). The trial court ruled in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Spradlin v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated November 8, 1979Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- First State Bank of St. Charles v. FrankelMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State Ex Rel. City of Blue Springs v. RiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Washington v. BlackburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Fritz v. FritzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Heritage Roofing, LLC v. FischerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hill v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- R & J RHODES, LLC v. FinneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.