Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 2008No. COA08-277PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Defendant Michael A. Ford appeals from a judgment and commitment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery with a firearm in violation of North Carolina General Statute section 14-87. For the reasons set out below, we affirm.

The evidence presented at trial tended to show that on the evening of 15 March 2006, two men entered the ALCO convenience store on Highway 74 in Rockingham, North Carolina. The men wore hooded sweatshirts tied around their faces and toboggans. One of the men wore a dark blue bandana around his neck. The other pointed a silver gun at a store clerk…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. McClaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API