Legal Opinion
Loomis v. Vernon Mutual Fire Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
The defendant argues that the policy was issued to William Loomis and legal representatives and that at the time of the fire the insured property was owned by persons whose interest therein the policy did not purport to insure. Authority is cited that an insurance policy is a personal contract between the insurer and the named insured. That is undoubtedly true, but it does not settle the issues before us. It is not contended that the policy is so personal that it lapsed upon the death of William Loomis. It is admitted that the inclusion of legal representatives as insureds keeps the policy in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moyer v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Spohn v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Macomber v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Bradley v. Dells Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- Knoff v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- National American Insurance Company, a Nebraska Corporation v. Jamison Agency, Inc., Gerald Bollinger, Capital Systems Corporation, National American Insurance Company, a Nebraska Corporation, Third Party v. Jamison Agency, Inc., and Gerald Bollinger, Third Party Capital Systems Corporation, Third Party v. A.J.R., Inc., Formerly Pinkerton Madden Burford, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Forbes v. American International InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Estate of Carroll G. Frye v. MMG Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Estate v. MMG Ins. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.