United States v. Jamal Aden
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Jamal Mohamud Aden appeals his eight-month sentence for wire fraud as procedurally and substantively unreasonable. He also challenges the district court’s 1 finding of a loss amount of $194,869 and the resulting restitution award. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Aden owned and operated two convenience stores in St. Paul, Minnesota: St. Paul Grocery 1 (SPG1) and St. Paul Grocery 2 (SPG2). In October 2010, Aden signed the Food Nutrition Service (FNS) 252 application for SPG1, making the store eligible to participate in the Supplemental Nutrition and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Leonard R. FazioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Cheryll S. Coon, United States of America v. Ferrell Travis RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. StatmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Jeremy KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Bradley CornelsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Garland NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Melvin HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019