Legal Opinion

United States v. Jamal Aden

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 29, 2016No. 15-2950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Jamal Mohamud Aden appeals his eight-month sentence for wire fraud as procedurally and substantively unreasonable. He also challenges the district court’s 1 finding of a loss amount of $194,869 and the resulting restitution award. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Aden owned and operated two convenience stores in St. Paul, Minnesota: St. Paul Grocery 1 (SPG1) and St. Paul Grocery 2 (SPG2). In October 2010, Aden signed the Food Nutrition Service (FNS) 252 application for SPG1, making the store eligible to participate in the Supplemental Nutrition and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Leonard R. FazioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Cheryll S. Coon, United States of America v. Ferrell Travis RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. StatmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Jeremy KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Bradley CornelsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Garland NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. Melvin HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API