Belk v. Belk's Department Store of Columbia, S. C., Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The validity of an in personam judgment is of coui-se dependent on jurisdiction over the person of the defendant. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L. ed. 565; Rutherford v. Ray, 147 N.C. 253; Doyle v. Brown, 72 N.C. 393. It follows that a judgment in personam can only be rendered against a foreign corporation when it has exercised its corporate functions within the State. Lambert v. Schell, 235 N.C. 21, 69 S.E. 2d 11; Goldey v. Morning News, 156 U.S. 518, 39 L. ed. 517.
“Whether a foreign corporation is doing 'business in North Carolina, so as to subject it to the jurisdiction of the State’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Babcock v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Loy v. Lorm Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Fulton v. TalbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Seraph Garrison, LLC v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Uhlich v. Hilton Mobile HomesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Bollard v. Volkswagenwerke, A.G.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.