Legal Opinion

Belk v. Belk's Department Store of Columbia, S. C., Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1959No. 239PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The validity of an in personam judgment is of coui-se dependent on jurisdiction over the person of the defendant. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L. ed. 565; Rutherford v. Ray, 147 N.C. 253; Doyle v. Brown, 72 N.C. 393. It follows that a judgment in personam can only be rendered against a foreign corporation when it has exercised its corporate functions within the State. Lambert v. Schell, 235 N.C. 21, 69 S.E. 2d 11; Goldey v. Morning News, 156 U.S. 518, 39 L. ed. 517.

“Whether a foreign corporation is doing 'business in North Carolina, so as to subject it to the jurisdiction of the State’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Babcock v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Loy v. Lorm Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Fulton v. TalbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Seraph Garrison, LLC v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Uhlich v. Hilton Mobile HomesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Bollard v. Volkswagenwerke, A.G.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API