Legal Opinion
Scotch Plains-Fanwood v. Syvertsen
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 8, 1991PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
251 N.J. Super. 566 (1991)
598 A.2d 1232
THE SCOTCH PLAINS-FANWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION, RESPONDENT,
v.
ALBERT J. SYVERTSEN, APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 22, 1991.
Decided November 8, 1991.
Before Judges PRESSLER, SKILLMAN and D'ANNUNZIO.
Albert J. Syvertsen, appellant, pro se.
Casper P. Boehm, Jr., attorney for respondent.
Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney for the State Board of Education, filed a statement in lieu of brief (David Earle Powers, Deputy Attorney General, on the statement).
The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Griggs v. Borough of PrincetonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wyzykowski v. RizasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Richard Grabowsky v. Twp. of Montclair (073142)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Paruszewski v. Township of ElsinboroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Care of Tenafly, Inc. v. Tenafly Zoning Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.