Legal Opinion

Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1988No. C4-88-228PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company appeals from a $1,000,000 judgment entered against it after an accounting malpractice action and subsequent garnishment. St. Paul Fire challenges the reasonableness of the Miller-Shugart settlement, the characterization of the accounting errors, and the propriety of the garnishment. The trial court found appellant a proper garnishee, bound by the terms of the Miller-Shugart stipulated settlement, and established $1,000,000 as the applicable insurance limit. We affirm.

FACTS

Baumann-Furrie & Company provided Ghent Grain & Feed,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. State v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Lewis v. MoorheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Steen v. Those Underwriters at Lloyds, London Signatory to Policy No. E0100191Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Hennings v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Hartfiel v. McLennanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API