Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Enid Ex Rel. Enid City Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 15, 1998No. 97-6223PublishedCited by 232 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Cecil M. Smith (Smith) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee City of Enid (the City) and Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System (the System) on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. 1 Mr. Smith also appeals from the district court’s refusal to exercise jurisdiction over his supplemental state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Background

Mr. Smith was employed with .the City as a firefighter.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Darlene Thomas v. International Business MacHines a New York Corporation Doing Business in the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Marvin D. Baker v. The Board of Regents of the State of Kansas and University of Kansas Medical School--School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Ball v. RennerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by232 opinions

  1. Koch v. City of Del CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Beck v. City of Muskogee Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Smith v. City of EnidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Muathe v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API