Legal Opinion

Thurman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1992No. 49A05-9204-CR-117PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTEAU, Judge.

Donnell Thurman appeals his convictions . of: Count I, Dealing in Cocaine, a class A felony 1 ; Count II, Possession of Cocaine, a class C felony ; 2 Count III, Possession of a Handgun With An Obliterated Serial Number, a class C felony 3 ; Count IV, Possession of Marijuana, a class A misdemeanor 4 ; and Count V, Carrying a Handgun Without A License, a class D felony. 5 He raises two issues for our consideration:

1. Was it error to deny the motion to suppress evidence?

2. Was the evidence sufficient to support the cocaine convictions?

FACTS

Neighbors had lodged numerous complaints…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Ammons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Callahan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. JoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Lyons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API