Mason v. Goodnow
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin ■county, Lochren, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Action to set aside a foreclosure, under a power, of • an instrument similar in form to that considered in Hull v. King, 38 Minn. 349, (37 N. W. Rep. 792.) In that ease the objection was to the mode of making the sale, while in the present it is to the notice. The total sum secured was $1,300, which was apportioned among the different lots, so that each one was “conveyed and mortgaged, respectively, for the specific sum set opposite to it in the following tabular description of the premises herein and hereby mortgaged, and for no • other sum whatever.” Then follows the description of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hull v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Morrison v. MarchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Martin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- Child v. MorganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Peaslee v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Hamel v. CorbinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Bitzer v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- First National Corp. v. PerrineMontana Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.