Bitzer v. Campbell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Lochren, J., and judgment ordered for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This was originally an action to determine an adverse claim to real property in plaintiff’s possession, he alleging ownership of the same. By an amended answer defendant asserted that she was the owner of the premises, had been in possession in the years 1878 and 1879, and had ever since, of right, been entitled to the possession. She demanded that plaintiff specifically set forth his title, and this was done, in a reply, as having been derived through the foreclosure of a mortgage in the year 1878 under a power of sale therein contained. The reply further alleged that upon.the expiration of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hull v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Burke v. LacockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Russell v. H. C. Akeley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Marcotte v. HartmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Jellison v. HalloranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Child v. MorganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Lindquist v. AgreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Saxe v. RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896