Stuart v. Winnie
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFRitz, J.
The first error assigned is that the court erred in striking the designation “The Western Insurance Com*300panies” from the title of the action, as it was stated by the court on the form submitted to the jury for a special verdict. In the summons and in the complaints, which were served on one Rice, a general claim agent of the Western Casualty & Surety Company, the plaintiffs designated, as a party defendant, “The Western Insurance Companies,” which plaintiffs alleged was a foreign corporation that had issued an automobile liability policy to the defendant Winnie. His answers promptly denied…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Callies v. Reliance Laundry Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lantis v. CondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- White v. LunderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Lansburgh & Bro. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- McKee v. NeilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.