Legal Opinion

Boreen v. Christensen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1996No. 96-011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

Plaintiff Katharine S. Boreen (Boreen) appeals the September 14, 1995 Order of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, granting qualified immunity to Defendant F. Guy Youngblood (Youngblood) and dismissing Boreen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim as to Defendant Youngblood. We affirm.

We consider the following issue on appeal:

Did the District Court err in granting Defendant Youngblood qualified immunity on the basis that Boreen’s property interest in her employment was not clearly established law at the time she was constructively discharged by the Defendants?

Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Orozco v. DayMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Losleben v. OppedahlMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cockrell v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State UniversityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. In Re the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem & Conservator for WatsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Duncan v. Mississippi Board of NursingDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API