Legal Opinion

Losleben v. Oppedahl

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2004No. 02-325PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Plaintiff Richard J. Losleben (Losleben) appeals the February 28, 2002 order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, granting qualified immunity to Defendant Wayne Capp (Capp), dismissing Losleben’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim as to Defendant Capp, and denying Losleben’s motion for partial summary judgment. We affirm and remand.

¶2 Losleben raises the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in granting Defendant Capp qualified immunity on the basis that it was not clearly established at the time of Losleben’s discharge from employment that the Fourteenth…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Onofre T. Serrano v. S.W. FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stanley v. LemireMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Rosenthal v. County of MadisonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Dorothy King v. Virginia BettsTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. ReederMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cassady v. Yellowstone County Montana Sheriff DepartmentMontana Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API