Crawford v. Horton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The appellants assign error for the overruling of demurrer to the bill.
The averments in that pleading arc to be taken as true on demurrer. Lake v. Sealy et al., 231 Ala. 466, 165 So. 399; First Nat. Bank of Opp v. Boles, 231 Ala. 473, 165 So. 586.
The demurrer as filed is treated to the bill as a whole. Wood v. Estes, 224 Ala. 140, 139 So. 331; Messer v. Union Central Life Ins. Co., 227 Ala. 120, 148 So. 852. The demurrer was not directed to any particular aspect, and if in any aspect the bill had equity, such demurrer was properly overruled. City of Birmingham v. Louisville &…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sparhawk v. YerkesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Dushane v. BeallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wragg v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Van Antwerp v. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Garvich v. Associates Financial Services Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Rochell v. OatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Cox v. JunkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.