Legal Opinion

Crosby Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Durham

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1938No. 33085PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crosby Lumber Manufacturing Company, appellant, is engaged in the manufacture of lumber, and entered into a contract with C.C. Stockstill reading as follows: "This contract made and entered into this 2 day of November, 1935, by and between Crosby Lumber Manufacturing Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as first party, and C.C. Stockstill, hereinafter referred to as second party, witnesseth; For and in consideration of one dollar ($1.00) paid each other, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by both, and other considerations hereinafter set out, first party and second party…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  2. McDonald v. Hall-Neely Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. NationsMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Brown v. ColeyMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. WheelessMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Carr v. CRABTREEMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Boyd v. Crosby Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Webster v. Mississippi Publishers Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Meridian Taxicab Co., Inc. v. WardMississippi Supreme Court · 1939

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API