Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Board of Psychologist Examiners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 1986No. CA A29557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

As a result of complaints filed against petitioner, the Board of Psychologist Examiners served her with a Notice of Proposed Revocation of License containing 19 charges. After a 13-day hearing, the hearings examiner dismissed 16 of the charges. The Board, in its final order, sustained ten of the charges against petitioner and revoked her license to practice psychology, stating that

“any single one of the charges sustained against Dr. Gilmore is sufficient to our conclusion as to the appropriate sanction, and in arriving at our conclusion as to the appropriate sanction, we have determined that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Mary's Fine Food, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Gregg v. Oregon Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Heilman v. City of RoseburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Klein v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API