Legal Opinion
Heilman v. City of Roseburg
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 5, 1979No. 77-0781, CA 10167PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.
Petitioners in this writ of review proceeding appeal from an order of the circuit court affirming the city council’s denial of petitioners’ application for a zone change. Petitioners contend that the city council failed to follow proper procedures and that its findings are inadequate and not supported by substantial evidence. ORS 34.040. We reverse and remand.
Petitioners applied for a zone change for approximately three acres in the city of Roseburg. At the same time, they also applied for annexation and rezoning of an adjacent parcel, but the denial of that application is not challenged on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. SwainOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Bienz v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Anderson v. PedenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McCoy v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Clinkscales v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Cascade Broadcasting Corp. v. GroenerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Lyford v. BOARD OF COM'RS FOR BENTONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Alluis v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.